Conservative Law Committee passes living wage teshuvah

by: Rabbi Jill Jacobs

Wed May 28, 2008 at 15:10:43 PM EDT


The Conservative Movement's Committee on Jewish Law and Standards (aka "the Law Committee") this morning passed a teshuvah, written by yours truly, on the responsibilities of Jewish employers toward their workers.  In practice, this teshuvah applies to Conservative Institutions (synagogues, Camp Ramah, Schechter schools, etc.) as well as members of such institutions.  The teshuvah, which passed by an overwhelming margin (13-2-2, with 8 members not present) concludes:  
Rabbi Jill Jacobs :: Conservative Law Committee passes living wage teshuvah
1) The halakhic system supports a controlled free-market wage system when the market produces wages on which one can fulfill one's family with basic needs including food, housing, and health care. In order for the halakhah relating to workers and employers to function as intended, we must do what we can to restore a system in which people who work full-time are able to provide for their families' basic needs.

2) Jewish employers are obligated to treat their workers with dignity and respect. This obligation should include, but should not be limited to, prohibitions against publicly yelling at, mocking, or otherwise embarrassing workers; forbidding employees from speaking their native languages at work; banning all bathroom breaks; changing work hours or adding shifts without advance notice; or making improper sexual comments or advances toward workers.

3) Jewish employers must pay their workers on time, according to an agreed-upon schedule, and may not pay workers with bad checks. Employers must pay workers for the full time worked, including mandatory preparation and clean-up hours. Employers who hire workers through a contractor should make every effort to ensure that these workers are being paid on time.

4) Jewish employers may not knowingly put their employees lives at risk by failing to provide appropriate safety equipment and training, or by knowingly forcing workers to work under dangerous conditions.

5) Jewish employers should strive to pay workers a living wage,defined according to any of the possibilities outlined on pages 28-29 of this teshuvah. When deciding among the options available, employers should not select a wage level that, while technically considered a living wage (according to a local ordinance, for example), is so low that employers know that workers will certainly need to take on additional jobs, and/or to endanger their health by working an excessive number of hours.

6) In most cases, unions offer the most effective means of collective bargaining and of ensuring that workers are treated with dignity and paid sufficiently. Jewish employers should allow their employees to make their own independent decisions about whether to unionize, and may not interfere in any way with organizing drives by firing or otherwise punishing involved workers, by refusing workers the option for elections, or by otherwise threatening workers who wish to unionize. When hiring low-wage workers or engaging contractors who supply low-wage workers, Jewish employers should strive to hire unionized workers when possible.

7) The principle of dina d'malkhuta dina obligates Jewish employers to comply with federal labor laws, even when these laws are inconsistently enforced.

8) Jewish employees are obligated to work at full capacity during their work hours, and not to steal time; from their employers. Jewish union leaders should similarly strive to ensure that workers uphold the halakhic obligations of employees to employers. The ideal worker-employer relationship should be one of trusted partnership, in which each party looks out for the well-being of the other, and in which the two parties consider themselves to be working together for the perfection of the divine world.

The whole teshuvah will be available for download soon. The four living wage options that I offer are:

1. The living wage-- a living wage ordinance passed by the relevant county, city, town, or state.

2. The housing wage"--the amount that one would have to earn to be able to afford a 2-br fair market apartment without spending more than 30% of their income on rent.

3. Eighty percent of the area median income.

4. The self-sufficiency wage--the amount a person would have to earn to be able to afford food, housing, transportation, child care, etc.
Congratulations to the Law Committee for taking a step toward restoring Hoshen Mishpat (civil law) to its place as a central part of Jewish law.
As a result of the passing of this teshuvah, I hope that hundreds or thousands of the workers who help to make Jewish institutions function will earn enough to support their families. I also hope that, across the countries, synagogue members, rabbis, campers, and students will engage in thoughtful and productive conversations about how our payrolls can reflect our values and our halakhah (law).  
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Woo hoo! (0.00 / 0)
Yasher koach!!!  Is the full text online?

rock on Jill! (0.00 / 0)

I have not had a chance to read the latest draft (the one they actually passed) but I am looking forward to doing so.  Now all we have to do is get all of the other churches to adopt a similar policy....  Way to go, I know this took a lot of hard work.



Thanks for blazing the trail, Jill (0.00 / 0)

Thanks, Jill, for this fantastic work.  And yes, may it serve as a model for other religious groups as well.  I'll help spread the word.

 Robby Jones

www.progressiveandreligious.org/blog

 



Robert P. Jones, Ph.D.

President, Public Religion Research
http://www.publicreligion.org/


Very encouraging (0.00 / 0)
This has always been my problem with kashrut... it neglects all the other ethical aspects of our food systems.  It is so encouraging to see this kind of thing, even as a not-kosher Jew...

Kol Hakavod (0.00 / 0)
How wonderful that you were able to bring Jewish Law into the 21st century and address a clearly Jewish issue.  It is simply not enough to say that we as Jews support fair working conditions.  Our institutions must reflect it as well.  It is also significant to show that there are responsibilities on the employee as well as the employer. 

Job well done ... or not? (0.00 / 0)

Dear Jill and jSpot friends,

I've followed this case since the article in the Forward last month.

According to the JTA posting of May 29, you "softened the language" as follows: "Jewish employers should strive to pay workers a living wage...[E]mployers also should strive to hire unioinized workers when possible."

But the Forward article of April 24 states: "The opinion, which will be voted on by Conservatve Judaism's halachic policy body in late May, argues that rabbinic law obligates Jewish employers to pay their workers a wage sufficient to support themselves."

What does that mean, "should strive?"  Synagogues, Schechter schools, Ramah -- they all, on one hand, strive to pay people well, in accordance with their skills, to keep employees happy (that is, not to quit).  But on the other hand, they all strive to keep costs down, so as to keep dues and tuition down so more families can afford a Jewish education.  When push comes to shove, "should strive" will mean nothing.

So after what appears to be two years of effort, two turns at the law committee, during a time when everyone is thinking about the situation in Iowa, you walked away with the weakest of possible wordings.

According to JTA, other recommendations of the teshuva do use the wording "obligation."  So in other words, your teshuva might as well say: "Jewish employers are not obligated to pay workers a living wage or hire union workers."

Perhaps this is not a great victory; according the the Forward, this was your last chance with this issue. 

 



obligation and striving (0.00 / 0)

The Forward was wrong in reporting that the teshuvah, as of a month ago, "obligated" employers to pay a living wage.  My assessment, and that of many members of the committee, is that there's space in halakhah for saying that people SHOULD do something, but for realizing that not everyone is there yet.  There was some concern about the possibility that five minutes after the passage of the teshuvah, hundreds of institutions and other employers would find themselves now in violation of the law, and wouldn't be able to adjust in this fiscal year.  The teshuvah very definitely does not say that Jews "have an option" of paying a living wage or "should think about" paying a living wage--the point is that the expectation is the payment of a living wage, and we realize that some institutions/individuals will be able to get there sooner than others.

While the living wage portion of the teshuvah has gotten the most attention, please note that there are seven other conclusions, many of which go far in demanding--even obligating--appropriate treatment of workers.  



[ Parent ]
protractor ruler (0.00 / 0)

protractor ruler

protractor ruler

protractor ruler

solo headphones (0.00 / 0)
Solo HD monster
Monster Solo HD
solo headphones
solo hd
solo headphones
monster solo

User Blox 1
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
Job Losses Graphic
by: Mae Singerman - Feb 17
2 Comments
Comparing Obama to Hitler
by: Katie Halper - Aug 26
1 Comments

Search




Advanced Search

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

RSS Feed Links
Subscribe to JSpot in a feed reader!


Subscribe to JSPOT by Email!
User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

The views presented on jspot.org are solely those of their authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Progressive Jewish Alliance & Jewish Funds for Justice (PJA & JFSJ). PJA & JFSJ and jspot.org do not support or oppose candidates or political parties.
© 2011 Progressive Jewish Alliance & Jewish Funds For Justice. All rights reserved.

Site Design: Articulated Man
Powered by: SoapBlox