Three Cheers for CRA

by: Suzanne Reisman

Wed Mar 17, 2010 at 16:05:44 PM EDT


In the spring of 2009, certain politicians, pundits, and others lacking knowledge blamed ongoing foreclosure crisis on the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA).  A year later, I wondered if things had calmed down a bit (I don't know why I would think that, given the other rhetoric currently bandied about, but I guess I was trying to be optimistic.)  Nope.  People are still blaming a policy that tried to bring about some economic justice - and actually prevented the housing financial metldown from being worse than what is was - for today's woes.  Not only is this tactic a smokescreen for the real problems that we face, but it is also patently false.

Even if the CRA is not the hot topic these days, I think it is important to understand what it is.  CRA requires banks with branches in disadvantaged communities to stop discriminatory practices called redlining. Redlining means that no matter what the credit worthiness of a borrow is, if he or she lives within certain boundaries, banks summarily dismiss their loan applications. While redlining is technically illegal, banks continued to practice it anyway. CRA said that if you want to do business in a community, you need to find ways to responsibly invest in it. One way to do so is to find credit-worthy borrowers and provide them with mortgages. This worked very well for over 30 years.

Suzanne Reisman :: Three Cheers for CRA

Although the Act’s critics claim* otherwise, CRA does NOT mandate that banks lend to disadvantaged borrowers who are not credit-worthy, nor did it lead to banks lowering their underwriting standards to comply with the law. According to an independent study of 2006 mortgage loan data conducted by the law firm Traiger & Hinckley LLP, CRA actually deterred banks from engaging in the kinds of risky and subprime lending that brought on the foreclosure crisis. Specifically, the findings show that:

1. CRA banks were significantly less likely than other lenders to make a high cost loan;
2. The average APR on high cost loans originated by CRA banks was appreciably lower than the average APR on high cost loans originated by other lenders;
3. CRA banks were more than twice as likely as other lenders to retain originated loans in their portfolios; and
4. Foreclosure rates were lower in metropolitan statistical areas with greater concentrations of bank branches.

Whether one agrees with CRA’s mandate that banks responsibly serve the communities in which they accept deposits or not, the data shows that CRA actually deterred irresponsible lending. Further, the Treasury Department and the FDIC have emphatically stated that CRA is in no way responsible for the situation we are in today.  Yay, CRA!

Instead of blaming CRA, we should sing it's praises, hoist it on our collective shoulders, and give it s parade.  Or we could extend CRA provisions to the independent mortgage companies and bank affiliates from which at least 75% of subprime loans originated. That would probably be more productive than a parade, and leave less clean up - both figuratively and literally.  In either case, to continue to mislead the public on the benefits of CRA is not only immoral, but it would lead us into situation in which more – not less – of the irresponsible lending that created our current meltdown takes place.

*CRA critics also tend to claim that a national health care plan will destroy freedom and that churches that speak about social justice are fronts for communists, so take it for what it's worth.

Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
User Blox 1
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
Job Losses Graphic
by: Mae Singerman - Feb 17
2 Comments
Comparing Obama to Hitler
by: Katie Halper - Aug 26
1 Comments

Search




Advanced Search

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

RSS Feed Links
Subscribe to JSpot in a feed reader!


Subscribe to JSPOT by Email!
User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

The views presented on jspot.org are solely those of their authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Progressive Jewish Alliance & Jewish Funds for Justice (PJA & JFSJ). PJA & JFSJ and jspot.org do not support or oppose candidates or political parties.
© 2011 Progressive Jewish Alliance & Jewish Funds For Justice. All rights reserved.

Site Design: Articulated Man
Powered by: SoapBlox