Are Jews the New Wasps?

by: Mae Singerman

Tue May 11, 2010 at 14:38:11 PM EDT


If you're a social justice-minded Jew, are you concerned that although Jews make up only about 2% of the US population, with Elena Kagan's appointment, Jews will make up 1/3 of the Supreme Court?

If you're cool with that fact, is it because:
she's Jewish and you're Jewish or because you think Jews are smarter/more fair than the general population or because you think Jews are morally superior to other white people?

 

Mae Singerman :: Are Jews the New Wasps?

Or, are you all about it for some other, reasons that I didn't think of, because these reasons seem pretty dickish to me, even though I thought of them. Definitely make me nervous/question myself about what I think it means to be a white Jew in this country.

Headline question posed by Philip Weiss, in his thought-provoking article about the power Jewsh (think they don't) have. 


Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
JJ Goldberg thinks (0.00 / 0)

Obama should have nominated a Prostestant, given that Democrats have long made the case that diversity in and of itself is a important value.

I’m thinking more and more that the president should have nominated a Protestant to the court. Think about it: Liberals have been arguing for decades in favor of diversity as a fundamental value in schooling, hiring and choosing governing/decision-making bodies. How can a Democratic president take the step that renders the Supreme Court devoid of a single member of America’s majority? Even from a purely political point of view, how can a Democrat facing a tough midterm election send the message (however unintended) to the country’s majority demographic group, which happens to be the demographic that’s most wary of Democrats, that they’re not valued?

Full post here

So, after reading what Mae and JJ have to say on the topic, I find it hard to get worked up about either the absense of Protestants or the abundance of Jews on the Court. 

Mae, I was puzzled by the reasons you listed in your post. Do you really think that you have to be some kind of Jewish supremacist to support the President's nominee? How about... because you think she is a brilliant jurist and would make a great Justice? Or maybe you don't think the religion of the members of the Court matters very much? Or because it is just another sign that Jews, and women, have moved beyond tokenism? Or that the political analysis is that, contrary to at least one line of reasoning in JJ's post, most people don't care about the religion of members of the Supreme Court?

For me, it is a little of all-of-the-above. I think there are fair arguments to be made that someone else might have been a better choice. But I can't see advocating for proportional representation of various groups in our public institutions. If that were true, we'd have no Jews on the Supreme Court. Or in any other national body with fewer than 50 seats.  Would it be a bad thing if there were two or three African American Justices, even though that would place them at double or triple their proportion in the population?

JJ thinks Protestants will be upset not to see one of their own on the Supreme Court. But... I can't see it. When was the last time we saw the kind of angry backlash in public life based on Protestant resentment of Catholics and/or Jews? Take away the fringe elements, and it just isn't there. Race and gender and sexual orientation, even region, are today MUCH more powerful forces of division than the tensions among Christians or between Christians and Jews. Now, if there were going to be three Mormans, or (gasp!) athiests on the Court... well, that's a whole different story. But Jews and Catholics (as evidence by, say, their CURRENT numbers on the Supreme Court without protest) are clearly in with the Protestant majority. 

 

 

 

 



"When something important is going on, silence is a lie." -- A.M. Rosenthal

talking it out... (0.00 / 0)

Mik--Thanks for your thoughtful comments...I really wasn't trying to make an argument with my post that progressive Jews shouldn't support her. I posted about this because I was actually curious how people think about what is going on. I wrote the first arguments about why it it's fine to have such a large number of Jews on the Supreme Court that came to my mind and I wasn't satisfied with any of arguments. In fact, I thought my own arguments were pretty dangerous stories, some of which I've learned within the my Jewish community. So, your analysis is really helpful for me.  

 



[ Parent ]
another take on this (0.00 / 0)
from CNN here. argument boils down to this: six Catholics + three Jews = nine Protestants, because the differences are not super meaningful.

"When something important is going on, silence is a lie." -- A.M. Rosenthal

[ Parent ]
User Blox 1
- Put stuff here

Barack Obama
Job Losses Graphic
by: Mae Singerman - Feb 17
2 Comments
Comparing Obama to Hitler
by: Katie Halper - Aug 26
1 Comments

Search




Advanced Search

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

RSS Feed Links
Subscribe to JSpot in a feed reader!


Subscribe to JSPOT by Email!
User Blox 4
- Put stuff here

The views presented on jspot.org are solely those of their authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Progressive Jewish Alliance & Jewish Funds for Justice (PJA & JFSJ). PJA & JFSJ and jspot.org do not support or oppose candidates or political parties.
© 2011 Progressive Jewish Alliance & Jewish Funds For Justice. All rights reserved.

Site Design: Articulated Man
Powered by: SoapBlox